John Kerry for President

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

Letter to the Editor:

The Journal News

October 25, 2004

On March 4, 1789 the New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the new Constitution of these United States. Therefore the Constitution became officially the “law of the land.”

The Preamble states the following:

“We, the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish the Constitution for the United States of America.”

With regards to that famous and profound “Preamble” the Founding Fathers created a magnificent document that was in a philosophical sense a more conservative departure from the Declaration of Independence that stated:

“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness…”

Most Presidents, whether they are the good, the bad or the ugly have stood up for these precepts. But we are, as Arthur Schlesinger Jr. has said, “ a different country every generation.”  Therefore with all the changes that history has witnessed over the last 228 years there have been many, many changes, but the Constitution has still remained relevant and the most important document in the history of free governments. But the Constitution without the Preamble and the Bill of Rights is still only a document creating a framework of government. I believe that Harold L. Ickes said “the Bill of Rights means nothing to a hungry man!” Therefore the Preamble and the Bill of Rights must deliver to keep on separating the American People from the rest of the governed around the world.

In regarding the Preamble, the phrase “insure domestic tranquility” is most important to me. No matter how we feel about politics, taxation, state’s rights, the “establishment clause,” foreign intrigue and adventurism, and the like, we all accept as a “given” that all Presidents will provide for the “common defense,” and protect our nation state in times of grave peril. Obviously that is why the Congress and the People of the United States usually back their Chief Executive on those matters. Whether it was the firing on Fort Sumter, or the “freedom of seas,” issue that came about with our Undeclared War with France, the Barbary Coast War, The War of 1812, or the First World War, or when we felt the Monroe Doctrine was being infringed upon, or whether we were attacked at Pearl Harbor, or whether we had treaty obligations, as with South Korea, the President was supported. In time of war we usually pull together and back our government.

The President is granted a great deal of latitude regarding these difficult periods. One could say that our current President was given that latitude regarding both Afghanistan, with its nest of Taliban and Al Quieda terrorists, and with Iraq regarding its history of regional bellicosity. Many of us backed both wars, understanding the gravity of our actions and the concerns expressed by the Executive Branch. Those two actions and their justifications are history now. We cannot remake them. We cannot go back in time. But now we have to consider whether these actions have been managed with sincerity and care. In my opinion they have been managed disastrously, and the continued rationale of the Iraq War becomes more of a question mark every day. In other words, it is always prudent and wise to smother or drown a fire, but throwing gasoline on a small brush fire can burn down the surrounding forest and may even threaten one’s own home. Therefore, from my perspective, as a person that would have certainly removed the Taliban and hunted down Osama Bin Laden to the ends of the earth, and I backed the President with those actions. Unfortunately he took his “eye off the ball,” diverted our attention and resources, and has so far mismanaged our whole effort. So where are we today, bogged down in an almost un-winnable war, fought by a “stretched out” and undermanned military. But that alone should not automatically cause me or most other reasonable people to “fire” a President.

Therefore one should explore further the record of accomplishment over the past four years, or even the intent. To me therefore the critical distinction revolves around how we survive domestically. With all that in mind, the President must remember the importance of the phrase “to insure domestic tranquility.” This President has done almost nothing to “insure domestic tranquility.” Coming into office without a majority of the electorate is not unusual, but receiving fewer votes than his opponent is quite unusual, but it has happened before. Coming into office in the wake of a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court is even more unusual. Therefore one would think that anyone coming into office with such a razor thin and judicially decided mandate, would work to heal the country, bring it together and to administer in a more bi-partisan effort. Therefore what is the record and why has the so-called “Compassionate Conservative” not achieved or even attempted this?

“Domestic Tranquility” is important to all. People do not eat in the “long run.” We have ongoing critical problems regarding our health care institutions, our failing educational system, our energy dependency, our trade deficits, our budgetary hemorrhaging, our blurring of the “establishment clause,” the future of our “safety net” entitlements, our job creation, our “jobs” outsourced overseas, our declining stock market, our soaring oil prices, our illegal immigration flood and a myriad of other problems.

But what has this President stood for? He has stood for tax cuts for millionaires, he has stood for state’s rights, he has stood for religious fundamentalism, he has favored the drug companies over the elderly, he has favored tax relief for the energy industry, he has favored the polluters over the environment, he has chosen and backed his anti-rights Attorney-General, he has supported buyouts of tobacco quotas, he is against “choice,” he is against scientific research, he opposed “caps on carbon dioxide emissions,” and he has sought to trivialize the US Constitution with frivolous amendments.

In other words, reflective of what he is for and what he has opposed, George W. Bush has divided this country unlike any President since the days of Vietnam. But he has gone one step farther. He has divided the country not only on foreign policy but also on domestic policy. Any and all Presidents must remember the phrase “insure domestic tranquility.” In other words people deserve from their government more activity than collecting tolls on a bridge.

As Franklin Delano Roosevelt said in his Second Inaugural on January 20, 1937:

“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”

Who are now the class of people who have too little? It is the elderly who must choose between food and drugs. It is our children who are looking at a new age of staggering debt; it is the next generation that deserves the cleanest water and air. It is a generation unborn that may see its coastlines disappear if the worst predictions of global warming come true. It is the middle-aged worker who is wondering whether after a lifetime of work he/she will see his pension disappear and social security bankrupt. It is the erosion of the middle-class, as jobs in manufacturing disappear from the American landscape. The real meaning of  “domestic tranquility” is peace and security at home. It is the promise of a bright future for all Americans. But we have entered into an age of anxiety and our leadership is deaf to all but the “squeaky wheel” of the powerful. It is the powerful that gets the proverbial “grease.”

Therefore I say it is time for a change, and we all have that power to actuate that change the democratic way, come next Tuesday.

The Westchester Sports Hall of Fame Dinner

A Temporary Escape into the Glorious Path!

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

October 7, 2004

Yesterday I found myself driving not only on the Cross Westchester Expressway towards the Boston Post Road and N. Barry Avenue, on my way to the Mamaroneck Yacht and Swim Club, but on a long meandering path leading back in time to a simpler and somewhat more enjoyable time. My parents were members of this club back in the late 1960’s, and I last spent an afternoon there with my newly married sister Kaaren and her husband Charles sometime in the summer of 1967.

The rationale for this new trip was the occasion of the 37^th annual induction ceremony and dinner of the Westchester Sports Hall of Fame. I was invited to attend by one of the honorees, Mr. David Rider, who was a former track coach and administrator at Mount Vernon High School (from 1964-1976), whom I met during my college days when I visited the high school to see my great friend the late Henry Littlefield, of sainted memory. Mr. Robert Douglas, the chairperson of New York State’s Section I Athletic District, nominated Dave, who is regarded as one of the greatest track coaches in the United States, during that period, and who is still thought of with great affection, as an unparalleled legendary coach, advisor, friend and mentor to many. I was asked by Dave to second his nomination, and I did that service with the greatest of pleasure. Earlier well known Mount Vernon inductees were John and Ralph Branca, Frank Carideo, Notre Dame All-American, Bill Collins, Fred and Ken Singleton, Earl Tatum, Lorenzo Thomas, Tony Veteri, and Ed Williams. So Dave joins some very elite company.

Dave and I really connected back in September of 1967, while I was teaching at Mount Vernon High School, while awaiting an opening in the United States Air Force’s Officers Candidate School class. Henry had left Mount Vernon, in June of 1967 for the hills of Northampton, Massachusetts and eventually the hallowed ivy covered walls of Amherst College. I spent some time following and helping the wrestling program under the inspired leadership of his protégé and successor Randy Forrest. At that time I also met  Dave’s assistant, a big man named Bob Brooke, who had joined the staff around 1965. He was a gruff giant of a man who always amazed me that he could squeeze himself into his Corvette. Brooke, who was from Pelham, had gone to college somewhere down south and had adopted an annoying southern-style of speaking. His verbal savoir faire sort of reminded me of Joe Namath, who was also a northerner from Beaver Falls, Pa., and while and after attending the University of Alabama, started to drawl like a “good old boy” coming out of Talladega Raceway. But in spite of his faux southern accent and charm, he wasn’t bewitching to me, and we did not get along too terribly well. I never had a clue regarding his animus, but years and years later, Madeline Littlefield told me the story of Bob Brooke. Brooke was Henry’s assistant coach, while Randy Forrest was going back to college in Virginia. Henry told Brooke, that when Randy returned he would again be his assistant. Of course, according to Madeline, Brooke, in spite of his large size, seemed to be quite insecure and immature. He seemed to think of Henry’s choice of Randy, to be his assistant, as a type of personal “rejection.” He, like many, looked at Henry as a father figure and seemed to be depressed over Henry’s unrequited “love,” and loyalty to Randy, who was a friend, a great wrestler, and had been his former assistant.  Along with that, Brooke got into some social problems at the high school, and Henry, who was a rising star in the system and the assistant principal went to “the mat” for Brooke and saved his “rear-end.” Of course Brooke reacted without much graciousness, and after Henry’s departure to Northampton, Randy Forrest, Henry’s protégé and heir, became an object of his ire. When I entered the picture as a great friend of both Henry and Randy, I experienced the same chill. But being young and naïve, I assumed that his coldness and sarcasm was a product of my personality and shortcomings. Frankly it didn’t really affect my life, but I still recall that uncomfortable relationship without any level of fondness. Over the next number of years, long after I had left teaching in 1969, I still followed track and field and the career of Coach Dave Rider. More or less Bob Brooke was still around, and I kept my distance from him, except for a perfunctory salutation of greeting.

Many years have passed since those days, and recently I learned that Brooke was a victim of Parkinson’s disease, and as I walked into the club, I wondered if he was well enough to be there. Later in the evening as I made my way over to Dave’s table I saw a man whom I did not recognize. He was thin, almost gaunt and sitting there, amidst the tumult, quietly with a blank looking stare. Finally I asked someone if the man sitting there was Bob Brooke? Of course it was, and at age 62 or so, he looked 15 years older. I was stunned, completely shocked and saddened. When I last saw him almost 30 years ago, he must have weighed 80 pounds more, was blond, muscular and the image of power personified. He was a giant, a behemoth! What can one say; good health is second to nothing. It is number one, and when it goes, often it goes forever! I sat down, introduced myself, and offered a few banal inanities. What was there to say? Could I say I was sorry that this had happened to him? Of course not! I just said hello and wished him the best. So many amongst the throng of athletes in attendance looked great. So many had aged well. But Bob was different, very different.

The evening was about Dave Rider, Gus Williams the fabulous Mount Vernon basketball star from the “Dream Team” of 1971, an NBA All-Star, and a member of the Journal News All-Century Basketball Team, BJ Surhoff, the major league baseball player, Tim O’Toole, the basketball coach at Fairfield and the New Rochelle Olympic Gold Medallist swimmer Cristina Teuscher. 

Of course my son’s track coaches at White Plains High School, Nick Panaro and Fred Singleton, a high school and college All-American, were there. They were products of Dave Rider’s great program at MVHS, and they had been wonderful for Jon. I always appreciated their excellent coaching, and we have been friends now for many years. It’s always nice seeing these guys and re-living those marvelous times when Jon was running track and making his name academically at the high school. My memories of those days glow with everlasting satisfaction.

But in honor of Dave, and with the added allure of Gus Williams, many of Dave’s great stars were there. All one had to do was to turn around and see Mike Young, an All-American, Bill Collins, who was a high school and college All-American, and now world record holder for 50+ year old records in many sprint distances, Walter Kirkland, Valjean Garret, Ken McBryde, an All-American, Clinton Young, a County Legislator, Tony Wells, Steve Groom and Milton Cobb. Of course, there were many others there from those days and it was a pleasure going back in time and seeing so many familiar faces from those bygone years. I sat with Ed Abbaticola, Braulia Oria and Joe Gherardi who were longtime members of the Mount Vernon coaching staffs from the 1970’s through the late 1990’s. I had brought my track and wrestling photo albums that had many pictures accumulated from the 1960’s to today and shared those images with them.

Ron Lyons, who was my gym teacher at Davis had left, in 1961, to teach and coach up at Somers High School. Over the years, I had seen his name in the newspapers many times chronicling his long successful coaching exploits. In fact, he is also a Hall of Fame inductee. I went over to his table, said hello, and after 43 years, I was shocked and amused when he said that he had remembered me quite well. That was a real a real “kick!” He had wondered what had happened to me, and I gave him a quick summation of the almost half century that had passed, and when that party broke up, we parted with a hardy handshake and a big smile!

For the first time in decades I saw, Ed Sands, whom I recruited for the White Plains Democratic City Committee in 1972 and scores of athletes, who will never be forgotten by those who saw them compete, on the friendly fields of competitive sport. I must also note that I had the added pleasure of seeing Mike “Beaver” Ansbro, my old basketball buddy from Traphagen’s basketball courts and Stepinac fame, who I see in White Plains every once in a while, the former longtime Mount Vernon Superintendent of Schools Bill Pratella, who I played softball with when I was in 8^th grade, and the great Harry Jefferson, the legendary lifelong White Plains, star athlete, coach, school administrator and mentor to thousands, including my daughter Dana.

It’s always fun to peak, for a brief moment, into the workings of another parallel world that is really so different from what I experienced as an adult. A world so necessary, and under appreciated, that develops so many of our leaders and role models. For few hours I traveled back to a time long passed, never to be replicated and only alive in the memories of those who have survived long enough to come and celebrate: life, good times, and the bitter sweetness of competition.

<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml” />

Williams, fourth others inducted into Westchester hall of fame

By KEVIN DEVANEY JR.
THE JOURNAL NEWS
(Original publication: October 8, 2004)

MAMARONECK — The first days of Gus Williams' basketball career at Mount Vernon were humbling. He was cut from the junior varsity as a sophomore in 1969 and he didn't crack the varsity until he was a senior. As his career blossomed — taking him from starting point guard on the greatest team in Westchester basketball history, to earning a scholarship to play at USC, to winning an NBA championship only a few years later — one thing always stayed the same. Williams never lost sight of where he came from. “When he was playing in the NBA, he was a role model for all children in Mount Vernon,” said Caroline Walters, a retired math teacher at the high school. “And he came back and is still giving to the community. He still lives in Mount Vernon. It's where his heart is.” Williams, who turns 51 on Sunday, was recognized for his lifelong achievements last night at the Mamaroneck Beach and Yacht Club when he and four others became the 37th class inducted into the Westchester Sports Hall of Fame.

All five inductees were in attendance, including Rye's B.J. Surhoff, an 18-season major-league baseball veteran; New Rochelle's Cristina Teuscher, an Olympic gold-medal-winning swimmer; Tim O'Toole, a Stepinac graduate and longtime college basketball coach; and Dave Rider, a decorated track coach and athletic director at Mount Vernon.

While Williams was being recognized for his 11-season career as a professional, that's not only how he will be remembered. He was the cornerstone of Mount Vernon's 1971 state championship team, which is widely considered the greatest high school team ever in Westchester, and was named to the all-century team by The Journal News in 2000. Williams went on to star at USC before being selected in the second round by Golden State in '75.

After two seasons with the Warriors, Williams signed with the Seattle SuperSonics, with whom he reached the '78 NBA Finals and then won a championship, the only title in franchise history, the following season. He was a two-time All-Star who averaged 17.1 points and 5.6 assists over 825 games. From a kid who struggled to make his school team to a player gracing the cover of Sports Illustrated, Williams is truly an inspiration. When he retired after his final season with the Atlanta Hawks in 1987, he went to the only place he ever called home. “It was important to me to stay close to Mount Vernon because this is where it all started for me,” Williams said.

Williams was nominated for the Hall of Fame by Walters, who taught at Mount Vernon for 34 years before retiring last spring. Until Walters retired, she would use Williams' story of determination to motivate students. “I would tell kids about him and how he didn't make varsity until he was a senior,” Walters said. “But I really held him up because he was such a good person. He was very unassuming. Even as his career went on, he never changed.''

Reach Kevin Devaney Jr. at kdevaney@thejournalnews.gannett.com or 914-696-8522.Reach Kevin Devaney Jr. at kdevaney@thejournalnews.gannett.com or 914-696-8522.

The Real George W. Bush and American Foreign Policy

September 24, 2004

It is no secret that I despise George W. Bush. There is nothing I particularly like about him in the least. Yes, I am a partisan Democrat, but to most of my more liberal friends I have been characterized as a moderate or middle of the road Democrat. Over the years I have always supported strong American foreign policy when it came to fighting Nazis and Fascists, containing Communism and dealing with brigands that threatened our right to freedom of the seas, i.e.: The Barbary Coast Pirates, The Undeclared Naval War with France 1797, the War of 1812, Woodrow Wilson's actions in arming our merchant vessels before WWI and FDR's Undeclared Naval War against German submarines in the years up to December 7, 1941, and even the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. All in all, when our national interest is in jeopardy we must take action to defend our interests and ourselves.

With regards to the Taliban and their Afghani nesting place, I supported our action to destroy their dominance over that unfortunate and beleaguered country. But from any military or historical perspective, our actions were slow, tentative and ultimately too little and too late. We allowed Al Queda, who was protected by the Taliban to escape, mostly intact, into the mountainous regions that divide Afghanistan and Pakistan. In other words, Commanding General Tommy Franks and the Joint Chiefs did not use our power to react quickly enough to really root out the problem of Taliban rule, win the war, eliminate Al Queda, and pacify the countryside. Even today, in the wake of the supposed removal of the Taliban, armed feudal warlords operating outside the province of our handpicked Prince of Kabul run most of Afghanistan. So what went wrong? We reacted slowly and then took our eye off the ball! We were deceived into thinking that Sadaam Hussein, a bad character left in power by GHW Bush foolishness, who's regime was more or less impotent from years of blockade, embargo, over-flight interdiction and the like, was the real enemy, the real focus, and his regime's removal was the solution to Islamic militancy and terrorism. So here we are in the swampland of two quagmires, not one!

John Kerry went to the Democratic convention, stated that he was ready for duty and went onto the campaign trail. Now of course we have been all entertained by the continuation of the theater of the absurd. All of us know that many people were disillusioned with the meat grinder that Vietnam began to be. Kerry volunteered, for whatever reason, good or bad. He was political by nature, he decided to get his “ticket” punched, and he served with distinction. A recent naval review certified that his medals were earned not manufactured or phonied like our Swft(ee) boat friends have asserted. He came back from Vietnam, and was conscience driven to tell his story, the stories he had heard from many others, and the truth from his perspective. (See the story below! I am not a usual reader of the Voice, but they have brought to the public's attention some of the seamier sides of our military history in Vietnam.) So Kerry's character was assailed and excoriated by the Bush minions who have also taken on Max Cleland and even John McCain. Of course GW Bush's own military record in the Guard, has been covered up and sealed away. Kerry's 20 years from 1972 to 1992 has been part of the public record, but where was GW Bush during that period and what was he doing?

Of course when it comes to the history of that era, I cannot really fault GW Bush for seeking sanctuary from Vietnam in the National Guard. All who lived through that era know that many of our peers sought similar refuge. Many were able to accomplish that end. Personally I was too stupid to make that effort. I was leery of the Reserves or the Guard and I was afraid that I would be called up years later for something else that would/could wind up interrupting my life. But, be that as it may, when I volunteered for Officer's Training School in the Air Force, I was rejected because of asthma. The fates have a funny way of playing themselves out!

Meanwhile my sense of this whole sordid electoral business comes down to a few basic facts:

a) The GOP and GW Bush keep on talking patriotism! In other words the Democrats aren't really patriots and can't really defend this country. That is a lie!

b) It wasn't so long ago when the GOP was accusing the Democrats of starting every war in the 20th Century. The Democrats were the war and intervention party. The GOP were the isolationists and proud of it! How times have changed!

c) It was GW Bush who landed on an aircraft carrier, stated “Mission Accomplished” and convinced the Congress and the press that his macho, go it alone strategy had killed the two-headed monster, Al Queda and Sadaam Hussein.

d) Kerry, according to the GOP, like all Democrats, is out to weaken our military, and to not support the troops! That is really farcical.

e) In truth, we sent most of our troops into combat unprepared, and most of our equipment was unsuited for this operation. We are supporting our regular army with an unprecedented draft of Reservists and Guardsman, who are basically unprepared for this type of duty and we are mounting up casualties for what real “end” in mind?

f) GW Bush did not level with the country about the supposed connection and threat that Sadaam Hussein posed, and he is not leveling with the country about what is really going on in Iraq.

g) Bush must come clean with the truth for a change and tell us what is really happening and what he really plans to do.

h) We must decide whether we want this type of miss-management; fraught with miscalculations, half-truths, and incompetence to continue.

The real issues aren't whether John Kerry earned his medals the “old-fashioned” way, or whether GW Bush went AWOL from Guard service, or was afraid of a flight physical and its results. The real issues are over competence, management and the direction of our country. My sense is our direction on both domestic and foreign policy is wrong and wrong-headed!

So when it comes down to it, the big issue is Iraq. Are we now fighting the wrong war against the wrong foe, and have created a situation where we cannot extricate ourselves out of it without making it worse? We need a change in management, the present one has failed miserably!

RJ Garfunkel

Possible Solutions to the Iraq Question

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

September 24, 2004

I am gratified to learn that I still have some smart, but deluded friends. I don’t disagree with my friends that are concerned with Homeland security. It is real concern and no one, for sure wishes or wants another act of terrorism on our shores, no less against our foreign interests. But ironically most of the people I know are really despise our current President as much or more than I do. Yes, many are really more liberal than I am now or ever was in the past. Whether being liberal, or more or less liberal is not a real issue to me. All the sane people, I know and like, feel for America. But as Stephen Decatur said “Our country! In her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be in the right, but our country, right or wrong.”

Meanwhile I still believe that we can get out of this quagmire. Therefore I would do something’s radically different.

a) I would promise to go to Iraq and speak to all of the parties.

b) I would threaten their leadership with the break off and the creation of a Kurdistan.

c) If that did not impress them, I would do just that and concentrate my troops there and let the Brits control Basra.

d) I would pressure Saudi Arabia into brokering a peace or threaten them with regime change! It would not need many troops, and it would scare them to death. In other words I would force SA to fund an Arab army to occupy the Baghdad, the Sunni Triangle and the basic center of the country.

e) I would drop heavy ordinance of incalculable amounts on the mountainous border area between Afghanistan and Pakistan. If we had to use tactical nuclear weapons to destroy their hiding place I would. Any indigenous peoples would be warned to move out or “a rain of ruin” would proceed.

f) I would tell Iran to drop their nuclear program in no uncertain terms. If they did not I would spend the next 3 months determining where their work was being done and where their leadership was concentrated. If they did not open up their country to inspectors I would use that period of time to plan an incredible air offensive that would destroy their work and their leadership. 

Other than that, we should put 300,00 more troops in Iraq and go door to door and attempt to disarm the country while wiping out the insurgency. It will mean more blood and treasure wasted but that could work. It would mean bring back the draft, for a limited period and establishing a real national emergency. 

Those are my thoughts-

Well if the choice is defeat by withdrawal or for any other reason, the chances that Iraq could be ruled by a super-Taliban could be extremely possible. Iraq has incredible wealth and potential power in comparison to Afghanistan, and a defeat there could prove catastrophic to the regions interests and stability. But the way Bush has handled the whole effort, from the beginning lies to the current fantasies, foreshadows a possible disaster. He should have leveled with the public in the last 6 months. He would have jeopardized his Presidency, but he would have been honest. His dishonesty is quantum leaps ahead of Clinton's personal peccadilloes. By leveling with the public he would have admitted his earlier miscalculations, and then put on the table the real stakes in this game. But the public is not now really aware of the danger a withdrawal would precipitate. They are being spoon fed pabulum on this one. He wants it both ways and I am not sure that is possible. Of course one possibility is that if Bush wins, the Iraqi dissidents will believe that they have no real chance of winning, and they may choose to fade into the background and wait for a better chance later on. Of course if they do, the Iraqis will rebuild their army and police infrastructure, and rebellion and insurrection will be more difficult. An Iraqi Army/police that was well armed and trained would be much more brutal with any potential rebellion. Their families would be targeted and with enough strength and the absence of democratic shackles the army could possibly succeed. Of course that is if the American election means something. 

To me the key is the Arab world and their potential armies. They must be forced into the fray by our blackmail. It could work, but in the long run we will really expose where the moderate Arabs are. Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait can provide enough soldiers, oil and wealth. This would be a way to keep Saudi Arabia under greater control. Personally if they fail to make this effort, then we can replace the princelings, too bad for them! The average Saudi in the street would be quite happy!

rjg

The Real George W. Bush and American Foreign Policy

September 24, 2004

It is no secret that I despise George W. Bush. There is nothing I particularly like about him in the least. Yes, I am a partisan Democrat, but to most of my more liberal friends I have been characterized as a moderate or middle of the road Democrat. Over the years I have always supported strong American foreign policy when it came to fighting Nazis and Fascists, containing Communism and dealing with brigands that threatened our right to freedom of the seas, i.e.: The Barbary Coast Pirates, The Undeclared Naval War with France 1797, the War of 1812, Woodrow Wilson's actions in arming our merchant vessels before WWI and FDR's Undeclared Naval War against German submarines in the years up to December 7, 1941, and even the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. All in all, when our national interest is in jeopardy we must take action to defend our interests and ourselves.

With regards to the Taliban and their Afghani nesting place, I supported our action to destroy their dominance over that unfortunate and beleaguered country. But from any military or historical perspective, our actions were slow, tentative and ultimately too little and too late. We allowed Al Queda, who was protected by the Taliban to escape, mostly intact, into the mountainous regions that divide Afghanistan and Pakistan. In other words, Commanding General Tommy Franks and the Joint Chiefs did not use our power to react quickly enough to really root out the problem of Taliban rule, win the war, eliminate Al Queda, and pacify the countryside. Even today, in the wake of the supposed removal of the Taliban, armed feudal warlords operating outside the province of our handpicked Prince of Kabul run most of Afghanistan. So what went wrong? We reacted slowly and then took our eye off the ball! We were deceived into thinking that Sadaam Hussein, a bad character left in power by GHW Bush foolishness, who's regime was more or less impotent from years of blockade, embargo, over-flight interdiction and the like, was the real enemy, the real focus, and his regime's removal was the solution to Islamic militancy and terrorism. So here we are in the swampland of two quagmires, not one!

John Kerry went to the Democratic convention, stated that he was ready for duty and went onto the campaign trail. Now of course we have been all entertained by the continuation of the theater of the absurd. All of us know that many people were disillusioned with the meat grinder that Vietnam began to be. Kerry volunteered, for whatever reason, good or bad. He was political by nature, he decided to get his “ticket” punched, and he served with distinction. A recent naval review certified that his medals were earned not manufactured or phonied like our Swft(ee) boat friends have asserted. He came back from Vietnam, and was conscience driven to tell his story, the stories he had heard from many others, and the truth from his perspective. (See the story below! I am not a usual reader of the Voice, but they have brought to the public's attention some of the seamier sides of our military history in Vietnam.) So Kerry's character was assailed and excoriated by the Bush minions who have also taken on Max Cleland and even John McCain. Of course GW Bush's own military record in the Guard, has been covered up and sealed away. Kerry's 20 years from 1972 to 1992 has been part of the public record, but where was GW Bush during that period and what was he doing?

Of course when it comes to the history of that era, I cannot really fault GW Bush for seeking sanctuary from Vietnam in the National Guard. All who lived through that era know that many of our peers sought similar refuge. Many were able to accomplish that end. Personally I was too stupid to make that effort. I was leery of the Reserves or the Guard and I was afraid that I would be called up years later for something else that would/could wind up interrupting my life. But, be that as it may, when I volunteered for Officer's Training School in the Air Force, I was rejected because of asthma. The fates have a funny way of playing themselves out!

Meanwhile my sense of this whole sordid electoral business comes down to a few basic facts:

a) The GOP and GW Bush keep on talking patriotism! In other words the Democrats aren't really patriots and can't really defend this country. That is a lie!

b) It wasn't so long ago when the GOP was accusing the Democrats of starting every war in the 20th Century. The Democrats were the war and intervention party. The GOP were the isolationists and proud of it! How times have changed!

c) It was GW Bush who landed on an aircraft carrier, stated “Mission Accomplished” and convinced the Congress and the press that his macho, go it alone strategy had killed the two-headed monster, Al Queda and Sadaam Hussein.

d) Kerry, according to the GOP, like all Democrats, is out to weaken our military, and to not support the troops! That is really farcical.

e) In truth, we sent most of our troops into combat unprepared, and most of our equipment was unsuited for this operation. We are supporting our regular army with an unprecedented draft of Reservists and Guardsman, who are basically unprepared for this type of duty and we are mounting up casualties for what real “end” in mind?

f) GW Bush did not level with the country about the supposed connection and threat that Sadaam Hussein posed, and he is not leveling with the country about what is really going on in Iraq.

g) Bush must come clean with the truth for a change and tell us what is really happening and what he really plans to do.

h) We must decide whether we want this type of miss-management; fraught with miscalculations, half-truths, and incompetence to continue.

The real issues aren't whether John Kerry earned his medals the “old-fashioned” way, or whether GW Bush went AWOL from Guard service, or was afraid of a flight physical and its results. The real issues are over competence, management and the direction of our country. My sense is our direction on both domestic and foreign policy is wrong and wrong-headed!

So when it comes down to it, the big issue is Iraq. Are we now fighting the wrong war against the wrong foe, and have created a situation where we cannot extricate ourselves out of it without making it worse? We need a change in management, the present one has failed miserably!

RJ Garfunkel