Zetcasino Payment Conditions

Zetcasino Payment Conditions

This reference covers recorded deposit and withdrawal methods, processing conditions, limits, and verification requirements. It also notes fees and account conditions that may affect access to funds.

Zetcasino

Your next round starts at Zetcasino.

Play at Zetcasino

For the broader payment context associated with this entry, see https://zetcasino-eu.com/.

The listed deposit methods are varied, while the recorded withdrawal route is more limited.

  • VISA
  • MasterCard
  • Skrill
  • Neteller
  • Paysafe Card
  • Bank transfer
  • Klarna
  • Multibanco
  • Boleto

This table brings together the recorded deposit and withdrawal processing conditions, account rules, and payment restrictions.

Payment and account conditions
Area Recorded condition
Deposit processing Instant
Deposit turnover before withdrawal x1
Withdrawal processing time Within 3 business days after the request and/or 3 business days after the last withdrawal request was paid out
Withdrawal processing hours 6 AM to 5 PM GMT, Monday to Friday
Simultaneous withdrawal requests Up to 3
Withdrawal method Same as the deposit method where possible
Credit card withdrawals Requests up to the total amount deposited may be paid as refunds against purchases
Third-party deposits Not allowed
User-to-user transfers Not allowed
Dormant account After 180 days of inactivity, a monthly fee of EUR 5 applies
Zetcasino

Browse the slots. Find a live table.

Register & Play

The withdrawal schedule gives daily and monthly limits by tier and currency. The figures below show EUR and CAD amounts for each recorded tier.

Withdrawal limits in EUR and CAD
Tier Currency Daily limit Monthly limit
Alpha EUR 500 7,000
Alpha CAD 750 10,500
Beta EUR 500 10,000
Beta CAD 750 15,000
Gamma EUR 800 12,000
Gamma CAD 1,200 18,000
Delta EUR 1,000 15,000
Delta CAD 1,500 23,000
Zeta EUR 1,500 20,000
Zeta CAD 2,300 30,000

The tier names are recorded, but no rules for qualifying for a tier are provided. Limits vary by currency; EUR and CAD figures should be read separately.

Verification is required before withdrawal. The table distinguishes the submission and review timings from the categories of evidence accepted.

Verification requirements and timing
Requirement Recorded detail
Verification before withdrawal Required
Document submission deadline 30 days
Review after complete document receipt 24 to 48 hours after all requested documents are received in full
Usual verification time 10 days
Identity evidence Properly certified ID, passport, driving licence, or identity card
Residence evidence Proof of residence, utility bill, or rental agreement
Payment ownership evidence Proof of ownership of payment methods used; bank statements or credit/debit card statements
Payment transaction evidence Transaction histories for payment methods used, covering the last 1 to 3 months
Support contact support@zetcasino.com

A 10% commission is recorded for withdrawals where wagered funds are below the deposit amount, subject to the listed currency-specific minimums.

Minimum commission by currency
Currency Minimum commission
EUR 0.50
CAD 0.75
NZD 1
INR 40
TRY 17.5
HUF 200
NOK 5
PLN 2.25
BRL 3
CZK 12.5
CHF 0.55
ZAR 8
USD 0.50

Other recorded fee conditions apply to particular transaction circumstances and should not be read as universal withdrawal charges.

Additional transaction conditions
Condition Recorded effect
Insufficient wagering before withdrawal If wagered funds are less than the deposit amount, winnings may be cancelled and a 10% commission applies, subject to currency-specific minimums
Bank card or bank transfer account balance charge A 15% commission may apply if the account balance has been charged with a bank card or bank transfer
Japan live casino exception Live casino games require x5 minimum funds rollover before withdrawal
Refund after betting A refund cannot be made after the deposit in question or its associated bonus has been used to place a bet
Refund request deadline Within 24 hours after the transaction in question
Refund response time Within 10 business days

Slottio Casino Deposits and Withdrawals

Slottio Casino Deposits and Withdrawals

This reference records the listed deposit and withdrawal routes and their associated payment conditions. Deposit methods and withdrawal categories are not identical, so they are set out separately below. Amounts are stated in euros where a currency is recorded. For the site reference, see slottio.eu.com.

Slottio

Ready to play at Slottio? Create an account and jump in.

Sign Up & Play

The recorded deposit methods are:

  • MasterCard
  • American Express
  • Visa
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Giropay
  • Sofort

The listed withdrawal categories are bank transfer, e-wallet and cryptocurrency.

The deposit conditions below cover fees, processing, wagering and account requirements that apply to the recorded routes.

Deposit conditions
Condition Recorded detail
Casino deposit fee None; the payment provider may charge its own fee.
Deposit processing Most deposits are processed instantly or within a few minutes.
Initial deposit before withdrawal Must be wagered at least once.
Third-party payment methods Not allowed.
Deposit account Deposits should come from a personal account, not a business account.
Cryptocurrency credentials Current wallet credentials must be used.
Slottio

Pick your game and join the action.

Register at Slottio

The withdrawal routes are listed by category, with a minimum amount recorded for each one.

Withdrawal routes and minimum amounts
Withdrawal route Minimum withdrawal
Bank EUR 100
E-wallet EUR 100
Cryptocurrency EUR 100

These are the recorded maximum withdrawal amounts by period; no monthly or per-transaction maximum is listed.

Withdrawal maximums
Period Maximum
24 hours EUR 1,000
7 days EUR 2,000

The following conditions describe withdrawal fees, timing, request frequency and restrictions on the destination or funds.

Withdrawal conditions
Condition Recorded detail
Casino withdrawal fee None; the payment provider may charge its own fee.
Processing time Typically within three banking days; longer processing may result from payment channels, additional account verification or public holidays.
Requests per 24 hours One.
Pending requests Only one pending withdrawal per payment method is allowed at a time.
Wagering before withdrawal All wagering requirements must be fulfilled.
Bet amount condition A withdrawal may be denied if the total bet amount is less than the last deposit amount.
Restricted funds Funds labelled as bonus or funds in aborted games cannot be withdrawn.
Withdrawal destination Withdrawal to a third-party account is not allowed; payment to another source requires sufficient information or documentation.
Withdrawal method Funds must be withdrawn to the same method used for the deposit.
Relative route timing E-wallet withdrawals are typically faster than bank transfers.

Verification is required before withdrawal, with the recorded deposit threshold and withdrawal trigger shown here.

Verification triggers and timing
Verification detail Recorded requirement
Deposit threshold EUR 2,000
Withdrawal trigger Any withdrawal request
Verification before withdrawal Required.
Typical verification time Within 48 hours.

Accepted verification documents include:

  • Government-issued photo ID
  • A selfie holding the ID document
  • A recent bank statement or utility bill
  • Source-of-funds documents
  • A photo of the card used for the deposit

Wat zegt de selectie over de speltypen?

Welke livegames zijn er bij Slottio?

Slottio vermeldt livegames als een van de drie hoofdcategorieën naast slots en sport. De informatie bevestigt dus een livecasino-aanbod, maar geeft geen volledig overzicht van afzonderlijke tafels of titels.

Slottio

Je volgende spelronde begint bij Slottio.

Speel bij Slottio

Voor het livecasino staan vijf aanbieders genoemd. Het totale spelaanbod omvat 23 aanbieders en bestrijkt slots, livegames en sport; dat aantal betreft dus niet alleen livecasino.

De vijf vermelde live-aanbieders zijn terug te vinden bij Slottio casino. Hun namen tonen wie bij de livecategorie hoort, maar zeggen op zichzelf niet welke spellen of tafels iedere aanbieder precies levert.

Wat zegt de selectie over de speltypen?

De concrete aanwijzing voor een spelvorm is roulette: in het merkmateriaal wordt 500x Cyber Auto Roulette genoemd als voorbeeld van een multipliergerichte livevariant. Dat geeft een specifieker beeld dan de algemene categorie ‘livegames’, maar bevestigt geen compleet rouletteaanbod. Een roulettevariant werkt bovendien anders dan een klassiek live tafelspel: de multiplierfunctie vormt een extra spelmechaniek.

Slottio

Bekijk de slots en vind een live tafel.

Registreren en spelen

De vermelde live-aanbieders zijn:

  • 7Mojos Live
  • Vivo
  • Betgames Tv
  • Iconic21
  • Winfinity Live

De namen maken de aanbiederselectie concreet, maar zijn geen lijst van afzonderlijke spellen. Op basis van de beschikbare details is roulette dus de benoemde spelvorm; voor andere specifieke livegenres, zoals spelshows of afzonderlijke tafelspellen, is geen bevestigde titel opgegeven.

Slik velger du mobilrute hos Hugo casino

Hugo casino – mobil tilgang og spillobby

Vil du bruke Hugo casino fra mobilen, eller er en egen app det naturlige valget? Den oppgitte mobiltilgangen er en mobiltilpasset nettside, ikke en bekreftet app-rute. Det gjør nettleseren til det tydeligste utgangspunktet.

Hugo casino

Velg et spill og bli med hos Hugo casino.

Bli med og spill

Mobilplattformen er oppgitt å støtte alle mobile enheter og nettlesere. Før du går videre, er det likevel nyttig å tenke på hva du vil gjøre: finne et spill, delta i en turnering eller håndtere noe på kontoen.

Bruk https://hugocasino.co.com/no/ som neste sted å kontrollere hvilken mobiltilgang og hvilke aktuelle vilkår som vises nå.

Slik velger du mobilrute hos Hugo casino

Begynn med nettleseren på telefonen eller nettbrettet. Plattformen er optimalisert for mobilnett, og HTML5-spill er blant funksjonene som er oppgitt. Du trenger derfor ikke å behandle appinstallasjon som et nødvendig første steg. Det er ikke grunnlag her for å velge en egen app-rute.

Hugo casino

Se gjennom spilleautomatene og finn et livebord.

Registrer deg og spill

Gå videre ut fra den konkrete oppgaven, og sjekk at siden viser det du trenger før du fortsetter. Mobiltilgangen omfatter flere typer aktivitet, men det betyr ikke automatisk at hvert spill eller hver funksjon er identisk med en eventuell skrivebordsvisning.

  • Åpne casinoet i en mobilnettleser og se at siden tilpasser seg skjermen.
  • Finn riktig område i spillobbyen før du åpner et spill.
  • Hvis målet er en turnering eller bonus, kontroller at den aktuelle delen og vilkårene vises på mobilen.
  • For transaksjoner eller kontakt med kundestøtte, gå til den aktuelle kontofunksjonen og kontroller informasjonen før du fortsetter.

Bruk spillobbyen til å snevre inn valget

Lobbyen er delt inn i kategorier som spilleautomater, live casino, bordspill, crash og roulette. Det gir en konkret måte å orientere seg på en mindre skjerm: velg først spilltypen du ser etter, og vurder deretter enkeltspillene som vises. Drops & Wins og bonus buy er også egne kategorier i det beskrevne utvalget.

Dette skillet er særlig nyttig når du har en bestemt aktivitet i tankene. Live casino peker mot spill med direktesendt vert, mens bordspill og roulette er egne deler av lobbyen. Hvis du bare vil utforske, kan kategorien spilleautomater være et enklere startpunkt enn å bla gjennom hele utvalget. Kategorinavnene hjelper med oppdagelse, men sier ikke i seg selv noe om hvordan et bestemt spill fungerer på mobilen.

Kontroller funksjonen du faktisk trenger

Mobilplattformen oppgir støtte for å hente bonuser, delta i turneringer, gjennomføre transaksjoner og kontakte kundestøtte, i tillegg til HTML5-spill. Bruk denne oversikten som en praktisk sjekk, ikke som en garanti for at alle handlinger er tilgjengelige på samme måte i alle deler av lobbyen.

Skal du spille, åpne først den aktuelle kategorien og velg et spill som vises i mobilnettleseren. Skal du gjøre noe annet, gå direkte til bonus-, turnerings-, konto- eller støtteområdet. Da bruker du mobilruten til den oppgaven du faktisk har, uten å anta at en app må installeres eller at skrivebordsvisningen er kopiert nøyaktig.

Tom Brown’s School Days and his nemesis Harry Flashman – March 29, 2023

Tom Brown’s School Days (sometimes written Tom Brown’s Schooldays, also published under the titles Tom Brown at Rugby, School Days at Rugby, and Tom Brown’s School Days at Rugby) is an 1857 novel by Thomas Hughes. The story is set in the 1830s at Rugby School, an English public school. Hughes attended Rugby School from 1834 to 1842.

The novel was originally published as being “by an Old Boy of Rugby”, and much of it is based on the author’s experiences. Tom Brown is largely based on the author’s brother George Hughes. George Arthur, another of the book’s main characters, is generally believed to be based on Arthur Penrhyn Stanley (Dean Stanley). The fictional Tom’s life also resembles the author’s, in that the culminating event of his school career was a cricket match. The novel also features Dr Thomas Arnold (1795–1842), who was the actual headmaster of Rugby School from 1828 to 1841.

Tom Brown’s School Days has been the source for several film and television adaptations. It also influenced the genre of British school novels, which began in the nineteenth century, and led to fictional depictions of schools such as Mr Chips‘s Brookfield, (Goodbye Mr. Chips, Robert Donat, Academy Award Winner, Best Actor, 1939, and Greer Garson) and St Trinian’s. A sequel, Tom Brown at Oxford, was published in 1861.

Tom Brown is energetic, stubborn, kind-hearted and athletic, rather than intellectual. He follows his feelings and the unwritten rules of the boys.

The early chapters of the novel deal with his childhood at his home in the Vale of White Horse. Much of the scene setting in the first chapter is deeply revealing of Victorian Britain’s attitudes towards society and class, and contains a comparison of so-called Saxon and Norman influences on the country. This part of the book, when young Tom wanders the valleys freely on his pony, serves as a contrast with the hellish experiences in his first years at school.

His first school year is at a local school. His second year starts at a private school, but due to an epidemic of fever in the area, all the school’s boys are sent home, and Tom is transferred mid-term to Rugby School.

On his arrival, the eleven-year-old Tom Brown is looked after by a more experienced classmate, Harry “Scud” East. Tom’s nemesis at Rugby is the bully Flashman. The intensity of the bullying increases, and, after refusing to hand over a sweepstake ticket for the favourite in a horse race, Tom is deliberately burned in front of a fire. Tom and East defeat Flashman with the help of Diggs, a kind, comical, older boy. In their triumph they become unruly.

In the second half of the book, Dr Thomas Arnold (1795–1842), the historical headmaster of the school at the time, gives Tom the care of George Arthur, a frail, pious, academically brilliant, gauche, and sensitive new boy. A fight that Tom gets into to protect Arthur, and Arthur’s nearly dying of fever, are described in detail. Tom and Arthur help each other and the friends develop into young gentlemen who say their nightly prayers, do not cheat on homework, and play in a cricket match. An epilogue shows Tom’s return to Rugby and its chapel when he hears of Arnold’s death.

 Thomas Arnold (13 June 1795 – 12 June 1842) was an English educator and historian. He was an early supporter of the Broad Church Anglican movement. As headmaster of Rugby School from 1828 to 1841, he introduced several reforms that were widely copied by other noted public schools. His reforms redefined standards of masculinity and achievement.

Arnold’s appointment to the headship of Rugby School in 1828, after some years as a private tutor, turned the school’s fortunes around. His force of character and religious zeal enabled him to make it a model for other public schools and exercise a strong influence on the education system of England. Though he introduced history, mathematics and modern languages, he based his teaching on the classical languages. “I assume it as the foundation of all my view of the case, that boys at a public school never will learn to speak or pronounce French well, under any circumstances,” and so it would be enough if they could “learn it grammatically as a dead language.” Physical science was not taught because, in Arnold’s view, “it must either take the chief place in the school curriculum, or it must be left out altogether.” Arnold was also opposed to the materialistic tendency of physical science, a view deriving from his Christian idealism. He wrote that “rather than have physical science the principal thing in my son’s mind, I would gladly have him think that the sun went round the earth, and that the stars were so many spangles set in the bright blue firmament. Surely the one thing needful for a Christian and an Englishman to study is Christian and moral and political philosophy.”

Arnold developed the praepostor (prefect) system, in which sixth-form students were given powers over every part of the school (managed by himself) and kept order in the establishment. The 1857 novel by Thomas Hughes, Tom Brown’s School Days, portrays a generation of boys “who feared the Doctor with all our hearts, and very little besides in heaven or earth; who thought more of our sets in the School than of the Church of Christ, and put the traditions of Rugby and the public opinion of boys in our daily life above the laws of God.”

Arnold was no great enthusiast for sport, which was permitted only as an alternative to poaching or fighting with local boys and did not become part of Rugby’s curriculum until 1850. He described his educational aims as being the cure of soul’s first, moral development second, and intellectual development third. However, this did not prevent Baron de Coubertin from considering him the father of the organized sport he admired when he visited English public schools, including Rugby in 1886. When looking at Arnold’s tomb in the school chapel he recalled that he felt suddenly as if he were looking on “the very cornerstone of the British empire”. Coubertin is thought to have exaggerated the importance of sport to Thomas Arnold, whom he viewed as “one of the founders of athletic chivalry”. The character-forming influence of sport, with which Coubertin was so impressed, is more likely to have originated in the novel Tom Brown’s School Days than exclusively in the ideas of Arnold himself. “Thomas Arnold, the leader and classic model of English educators,” wrote Coubertin, “gave the precise formula for the role of athletics in education. The cause was quickly won. Playing fields sprang up all over England

Tom Brown’s Schooldays was a 1971 television serial adaptation of the 1857 Thomas Hughes novel Tom Brown’s Schooldays. Consisting of five one hour long episodes, the series was directed by Gareth Davies and used a screenplay by Anthony Steven.

Tom Brown’s Schooldays originally screened on the BBC1 Sunday afternoon slot, which often showed serializations of classics aimed at a family audience. It made some free adaptations to Hughes’s novel, creating the role of Flashman’s father, and added new sub-plots about Flashman and Arnold. It also included scenes of bullying and corporal punishment which may have been too graphic for family viewing. “Clean-up TV” campaigner Mary Whitehouse claimed that the program broke the BBC’s guidelines on the depiction of sadistic violence.

After its 1971 premiere on the BBC, the series was later shown on Masterpiece Theatre in the United States in January and February 1973 through a grant from the Mobil Oil Corporation.[1] In his review in The New York Times, critic Howard Thompson wrote, “Two previous film versions of Tom Brown’s Schooldays (one from England) pale beside this home‐screen project, which so far (two chapters) seems almost too good to be true, even from Masterpiece Theater.” The program won the 1973 Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Limited Series, and actor Anthony Murphy won the Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie for his portrayal of Tom Brown.

Sir Harry Paget Flashman VC, KCB, KCIE is a fictional character created by Thomas Hughes (1822–1896) in the semi-autobiographical Tom Brown’s School Days (1857) and later developed by George MacDonald Fraser (1925–2008). Harry Flashman appears in a series of 12 of Fraser’s books, collectively known as The Flashman Papers, with covers illustrated by Arthur Barbosa and Gino D’Achille. Flashman was played by Malcolm McDowell in the Richard Lester 1975 film Royal Flash.

In Tom Brown’s School Days (1857), Flashman is portrayed as a notorious Rugby School bully who persecutes Tom Brown and is finally expelled for drunkenness, at which point he simply disappears. Fraser decided to write the story of Flashman’s later life, in which the school bully would be identified as an “illustrious Victorian soldier”, experiencing many of the 19th-century wars and adventures of the British Empire and rising to high rank in the British Army, to be acclaimed as a great warrior, while still remaining “a scoundrel, a liar, a cheat, a thief, a coward—and, oh yes, a toady.” In the papers – which are purported to have been written by Flashman and discovered only after his death – he describes his own dishonourable conduct with complete candour. Fraser’s Flashman is an antihero who often runs away from danger. Nevertheless, through a combination of luck and cunning, he usually ends each volume acclaimed as a hero.

Fraser gave Flashman a lifespan from 1822 to 1915 and a birth-date of 5 May. He also provided Flashman’s first and middle names, as Hughes’s novel had given Flashman only one, using the names to make an ironic allusion to Henry Paget, 1st Marquess of Anglesey. Paget was one of the heroes of Waterloo, who cuckolded the Duke of Wellington‘s brother Henry Wellesley and later—in one of the period’s more celebrated scandals—married Lady Anglesey, after Wellesley had divorced her for adultery.

In Flashman, Flashman says that his great-grandfather, Jack Flashman, made the family fortune in America, trading in rum, slaves and “piracy too, I shouldn’t wonder”. Despite their wealth, the Flashmans “were never the thing”; Flashman quotes the diarist Henry Greville’s comment that “the coarse streak showed through, generation after generation, like dung beneath a rosebush”. Harry Flashman’s equally fictional father, Henry Buckley Flashman, appears in Black Ajax (1997). Buckley, a bold young officer in the British cavalry, is said to have been wounded in action at Talavera in 1809, and then to have gained access to “society” by sponsoring bare-knuckle boxer Tom Molineaux (the first black man to contend for a championship). The character subsequently marries Flashman’s mother Lady Alicia Paget, a fictional relation of the real Marquess of Anglesey. Buckley, it is related, also served as a Member of Parliament (MP) but was “sent to the knacker’s yard at Reform“. Beside politics, the older Flashman character has interests including drinking, fox hunting (riding to hounds), and women.

Flashman is a large man, six feet two inches, about 180 pounds.. In Flashman and the Tiger, he mentions that one of his grandchildren has black hair and eyes, resembling him in his younger years. His dark colouring frequently enabled him to pass (in disguise) for a Pashtun. He claims only three natural talents: horsemanship, facility with foreign languages, and fornication. He becomes an expert cricket-bowler, but only through hard effort (he needed sporting credit at Rugby School, and feared to play rugby football). He can also display a winning personality when he wants to, and is very skilled at flattering those more important than himself without appearing servile.

As he admits in the Papers, Flashman is a coward, who will flee from danger if there is any way to do so, and has on some occasions collapsed in funk. He has one great advantage in concealing this weakness: when he is frightened, his face turns red, rather than white, so that observers think he is excited, enraged, or exuberant—as a hero ought to be.

After his expulsion from Rugby School for drunkenness, the young Flashman looks for an easy life. He has his wealthy father buy him an officer’s commission in the fashionable 11th Regiment of Light Dragoons. The 11th, commanded by Lord Cardigan, later involved in the Charge of the Light Brigade, has just returned from India and are not likely to be posted abroad soon. Flashman throws himself into the social life that the 11th offered and becomes a leading light of Canterbury society. In 1840 the regiment is converted to Hussars with an elegant blue and crimson uniform, which assists Flashman in attracting female attention for the remainder of his military career.

A duel with another officer over a French courtesan leads to his being temporarily stationed in Paisley, Scotland. There he meets and deflowers Elspeth Morrison, daughter of a wealthy textile manufacturer, whom he has to marry in a “shotgun wedding” under threat of a horsewhipping by her uncle. But marriage to the daughter of a mere businessman forces his transferral from the snobbish 11th Hussars. He is sent to India to make a career in the army of the East India Company. Unfortunately, his language talent and his habit of flattery bring him to the attention of the Governor-General. The Governor does him the (very much unwanted) favour of assigning him as aide to General Elphinstone in Afghanistan. Flashman survives the ensuing retreat from Kabul (the worst British military debacle of Victoria’s reign) by a mixture of sheer luck and unstinting cowardice. He becomes an unwitting hero: the defender of Piper’s Fort, where he is the only surviving white man, and is found by the relieving troops clutching the flag and surrounded by enemy dead. Of course, Flashman had arrived at the fort by accident, collapsed in terror rather than fighting, been forced to stand and show fight by his subordinate, and is ‘rumbled’ for a complete coward. He had been trying to surrender the colors, not defend them. Happily for him, all inconvenient witnesses had been killed.

This incident sets the tone for Flashman’s life. Over the following 60 years or so, he is involved in many of the major military conflicts of the 19th century—always in spite of his best efforts to evade his duty. He is often selected for especially dangerous jobs because of his heroic reputation. He meets many famous people, and survives some of the worst military disasters of the period (the First Anglo-Afghan War, the Charge of the Light Brigade, the Siege of Cawnpore, the Battle of the Little Bighorn, and the Battle of Isandlwana), always coming out with more heroic laurels. The date of his last adventures seems to have been around 1900. He dies in 1915.

Despite his admitted cowardice, Flashman is a dab hand at fighting when he has to. Though he dodges danger as much as he can, and runs away when no one is watching, after the Piper’s Fort incident, he usually controls his fear and often performs bravely. Almost every book contains one or more incidents where Flashman has to fight or perform some other daring action, and he holds up long enough to complete it. For instance, he is ordered to accompany the Light Brigade on its famous charge and rides all the way to the Russian guns. However, most of these acts of ‘bravery’ are performed only when he has absolutely no choice and to do anything else would result in his being exposed as a coward and losing his respected status in society, or being shot for desertion. When he can act like a coward with impunity, he invariably does.

Flashman surrenders to fear in front of witnesses only a few times, and is never caught out again. During the siege of Piper’s Fort, in the first novel, Flashman cowers weeping in his bed at the start of the final assault; the only witness to this dies before relief comes. He breaks down while accompanying Rajah Brooke during a battle with pirates, but the noise drowns out his blubbering, and he recovers enough to command a storming party of sailors (placing himself right in the middle of the party, to avoid stray bullets). After the Charge of the Light Brigade, he flees in panic from the fighting in the battery—but mistakenly charges into an entire Russian regiment, adding to his heroic image.

In spite of his numerous character flaws, Flashman is represented as being a perceptive observer of his times (“I saw further than most in some ways” In its obituary of George MacDonald Fraser, The Economist commented that realistic sharp-sightedness (“if not much else”) was an attribute Flashman shared with his creator.

Flashman, an insatiable lecher, has sex with many different women over the course of his fictional adventures. His size, good looks, winning manner, and especially his splendid cavalry-style whiskers win over women from low to high, and his dalliances include famous ladies along with numerous prostitutes. In Flashman and the Great Game, about halfway through his life, he counted up his sexual conquests while languishing in a dungeon at Gwalior, “not counting return engagements”, reaching a total of 478 up to that date (similar — albeit not equal — to the tally made by Mozart‘s Don Giovanni in the famous aria of Giovanni’s henchman, Leporello). Passages in Royal Flash, Flashman and the Mountain of Light, Flashman and the Dragon, Flashman and the Redskins, and Flashman and the Angel of the Lord suggest that Flashman was well endowed.

He was a vigorous and exciting (if sometimes selfish and rapacious) lover, and some of his partners became quite fond of him—though by his own admission, others tried to kill him afterwards. The most memorable of these was Cleonie, a prostitute Flashman sold into slavery in Flashman and the Redskins. He was not above forcing himself on a partner by blackmail (e.g., Pheobe Carpenter in Flashman and the Dragon), and at least twice raped women (Narreeman, an Afghan dancing girl in Flashman, and an unnamed harem girl in Flashman’s Lady).

Flashman’s stories are dominated by his numerous amorous encounters. Several of them are with prominent historical personages. These women are sometimes window dressing, sometimes pivotal characters in the unpredictable twists and turns of the books. Historical women Flashman bedded included: countless, too many to mention!

As well as bedding more or less any lass available, he married whenever it was politic to do so. During a posting to Scotland, he was forced to marry Elspeth to avoid “pistols for two with her fire-breathing uncle”. He is still married to her decades later when writing the memoirs, though that does not stop him pursuing others. Nor does it prevent marrying them when his safety seems to require it; he marries Duchess Irma in Royal Flash and in Flashman and the Redskins he marries Susie Willnick as they escape New Orleans, and Sonsee-Array a few months later.He was also once reminded of a woman that Elspeth claimed he flirted with named Kitty Stevens, though Flashman was unable to remember her.

He had a special penchant for royal ladies, and noted that his favourite amours (apart from his wife) were Lakshmibai, Ci Xi and Lola Montez: “a Queen, an Empress, and the foremost courtesan of her time: I dare say I’m just a snob.” He also noted that, while civilized women were more than ordinarily partial to him, his most ardent admirers were among the savage of the species: “Elspeth, of course, is Scottish.” And for all his raking, it was always Elspeth to whom he returned and who remained ultimately top of the list.

His lechery was so strong that it broke out even in the midst of rather hectic circumstances. While accompanying Thomas Henry Kavanagh on his daring escape from Lucknow, he paused for a quick rattle with a local prostitute, and during the battle of Patusan, he found himself galloping one of Sharif Sahib’s concubines without even realizing it but nonetheless continued to the climax of the battle and the tryst.

Flashman’s relations with the highest-ranking woman of his era, Queen Victoria, are warm but platonic. He first meets her in 1842 when he receives a medal for his gallantry in Afghanistan and reflects on what a honeymoon she and Prince Albert must have enjoyed. Subsequently, he and his wife received invitations to Balmoral Castle, to the delight of the snobbish Elspeth. For his services during the Indian Mutiny, Victoria not only approved awarding Flashy the Victoria Cross, but loaded the KCB on top of it.

 

 

The Swimmers! The Greats born in the 20th Century! – June 19, 2023

Today I reached 31,000 laps, 775,000 yards and 440.36 miles, in the past 23 months since I started counting. Swimming has been great exercise for me after my tennis days ended over eight years ago. It has helped with any arthritis pains I suffered with and other ailments. It keeps my weight down and I can eat quite normally and I sleep through the night. I suggest to all of you, get in a pool and start a regular regimen.

Listed below are some of the historical greats that the public became well aware of as they electrified the public with their exploits and careers

Duke Kahanamoku (was born on August 24, 1890 – and died January 22, 1968) was a Hawaiian competition swimmer, who learned and revolutionized the Australian crawl and the wall turns, and popularized the sport of surfing. A Native Hawaiian, he was born to a minor noble family less than three years before the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom. He lived to see the territory’s statehood. He was a five-time Olympic medalist in swimming, winning medals in 1912, 1920 and 1924. Kahanamoku performed in Hollywood as a background actor and a character actor in several films. He made connections in this way with people who could further publicize the sport of surfing. Kahanamoku was involved with the Los Angeles Athletic Club, acting as a lifeguard and competing in both swimming and water polo teams. He was the first person to be inducted into both the Swimming Hall of Fame and the Surfing Hall of Fame. The Duke Kahanamoku Invitational Surfing Championships in Hawaii, the first major professional surfing contest event ever held in the huge surf on the North Shore of Oahu, was named in his honor. He is a member of the U.S. Olympic Hall of Fame.

Johnny Weissmuller (was born in Hungary, on June 4, 1904 and died January 20, 1984) was an American Olympic swimmer, water polo player and actor. He was known for having one of the best competitive swimming records of the 20th century. He set numerous world records alongside winning five gold medals in the Olympics. He won the 100m freestyle and the 4 × 200 m relay. He is renowned for his impressive swimming career, which includes 52 US National Championship titles, and 67 world records. He competed at the Paris Games in 1924 and the Amsterdam Games in 1928 and won gold medals in the 100m freestyle and the 4 x 200m relay team events at both games. He also brought home gold in the 400m freestyle and a bronze medal in the water polo competition at the Paris Games. In 1927, Weissmuller set a new world record of 51.0 seconds in the 100-yard freestyle, which stood for 17 years. He improved it to 48.5 seconds at Billy Rose World’s Fair Aquacade in 1940, aged 36, but this result was discounted, as he was competing as a professional.  As a member of the U.S. men’s national water polo team, he won a bronze medal at the 1924 Summer Olympics. He also competed in the 1928 Olympics, where the U.S. team finished in seventh place. In 1950, he was selected by the Associated Press as the greatest swimmer of the first half of the 20th century. He was a well-known actor in Hollywood and television. Following his retirement from swimming, Weissmuller played Edgar Rice Burroughs‘ Tarzan in twelve feature films from 1932 to 1948. Weissmuller went on to star in sixteen Jungle Jim movies over an eight year period, then filmed 26 additional half-hour episodes of the Jungle Jim TV series.  Weissmuller saved many peoples’ lives throughout his own life. One very notable instance was in 1927: whilst training for the Chicago Marathon, Weissmuller saved 11 people from drowning after a boat accident. On July 28, 1927, sixteen children, ten women, and one man drowned, when the Favorite, a small excursion boat cruising from Lincoln Park to Municipal Pier (Navy Pier), capsized half a mile off North Avenue in a sudden, heavy squall. Seventy-five women and children and a half dozen men sank with the boat when it tipped over, but rescuers saved over fifty of them. Weissmuller was one of the Chicago lifeguards who saved many.

Gertrude Caroline Ederle (October 23, 1906 – November 30, 2003) was an American competition swimmer, Olympic champion, and world record-holder in five events. On August 6, 1926, she became the first woman to swim across the English Channel. Among other nicknames, the press sometimes called her “Queen.” Gertrude Ederle made history when she became the first female to cross the English Channel. Unfortunately, she lost her sense of hearing while achieving the feat and later devoted herself to coaching deaf swimmers. She also won 2 bronze medals and a relay gold medal at the 1924 Paris Olympics. Despite the foul conditions she was able to swim the Channel two hours faster than the five men who had accomplished it earlier.

Clarence Linden Crabbe II (was born February 7, 1908 – and died April 23, 1983), known professionally as Buster Crabbe, was an American two-time Olympic swimmer and film and television actor. He was USC’s first All-American swimmer (1931) and a 1931 NCAA freestyle titlist. He won the 1932 Olympic gold medal for 400-meter freestyle swimming event, which launched his career on the silver screen and later television. He starred in a variety of popular feature films and movie serials released between 1933 and the 1950s, portraying the top three syndicated comic-strip heroes of the 1930s: Tarzan, Flash Gordon, and Buck Rogers. I was an avid watcher of the three Flash Gordon serials.

Esther Williams (was born August 8, 1921 died June 6, 2013) was an American actress, competitive swimmer, and businesswoman. When she couldn’t realize her dream of participating in the 1940 Summer Olympics due to the outbreak of the Second World War, Williams went on to establish herself as an actress. She gained national recognition after playing Annette Kellerman in Million Dollar Mermaid and helped popularize swimming in the USA. She actually was in many GM films before they discovered she could swim!

Dawn Fraser (September 4, 1937- is an Australian freestyle champion swimmer. She won the Olympic individual event the women’s 100-meter freestyle three times in her career. She also won six Commonwealth Games gold medals. Much respected for her athletic abilities, she was also known for her controversial behavior. She became a swimming coach after her retirement. She is also a former politician. She was the first woman swimmer I was aware of as a teenager.

Donald Arthur Schollander (born April 30, 1946) is an American former competition swimmer, five-time Olympic champion, and former world record-holder in four events. He won a total of five gold medals and one silver medal at the 1964 and 1968 Summer Olympics. As a teenager in 1962, He moved to Santa Clara, California to train under swim coach George Haines of the Santa Clara Swim Club. Two years later at the age of 18, he won three freestyle events at the AAU national championships. He made the U.S. Olympic team in two individual events and two relays. Months later, he won four gold medals and set three world records at the 1964 Summer Olympics, at the time the most medals won by an American since Jesse Owens in 1936. His success helped earn him the James E. Sullivan Award as the top amateur athlete in the United States, and the AP Athlete of the Year. He was also named ABC‘s Wide World of Sports Athlete of the Year. At the 1968 Summer Olympics, he won another gold medal in the 4×200-meter freestyle relay, but finished second in the 200-meter freestyle, the event that he had considered to be his best. This was the first Olympics in which 200-meter swimming events were part of the competition. Following the 1968 Olympics, he retired from competitive swimming.

Diana Nyad (born August 22, 1949) is an American journalist, author, long-distance swimmer, and motivational speaker. She achieved national recognition when she swam around Manhattan in 1975. Nyad made headlines again in 1979 when she swam from Bimini to Juno Beach. In 1986, Diana Nyad was inducted into of the US National Women’s Sports Hall of Fame. On the morning of August 31, 2013, at age 64,, Nyad began her fifth bid to swim from Havana, Cuba to Florida, a distance of about 110 miles (180 km), accompanied by a 35-person support team, swimming without a shark cage,  but protected from jellyfish by a silicone mask, a full bodysuit, gloves and booties. At approximately 1:55 pm EDT on September 2, 2013, Nyad reached the beach in Key West, about 53 hours after she began her journey. Though there were questions about her effort, it was never disproved. The New York Times public editor observed on September 19, that the focus had shifted from serious questions about possibly resting aboard a boat, to more technical issues relating to whether her crews’ touching her while helping with her protective suit formally rendered the swim an “assisted” swim.

Mark Andrew Spitz (born February 10, 1950) is an American former competitive swimmer and nine-time Olympic champion. He was the most successful competitor at the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, winning seven gold medals, each in world-record time. This achievement set a record that lasted for 36 years until it was taken by fellow American Michael Phelps when he won eight gold medals in Beijing at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Mark Spitz won a plethora of medals and titles during his time, including nine Olympic golds, a silver, and a bronze; 31 Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) titles; five Pan American gold medals, and eight National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) titles. He also held 35 world records between 1968 and 1972 and his international swimming awards include World Swimmer of the Year in 1969, 1971, and 1972. Spitz went to work for ABC Sports in 1976 and worked on many sports presentations, including coverage of the 1976 Summer Olympics in Montreal and the 1984 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles figure except perhaps as a commentator for swimming events like the 2004 Summer Olympics. Spitz mow focuses on his real estate company in Beverly Hills and hobbies such as sailing.

Shane Gould (was born on November 4, 1956) Three-time Olympic gold medalist Shane Gould was 15 when she participated in the Munich Olympics. She stunned everyone with her early retirement at 16 and stayed away from the limelight for 25 years, eventually re-emerging after raising her four kids on an Australian farm and then breaking records at the 2000 Sydney Games.

 Matt Biondi  (was born on October 8, 1965) is a former American swimmer and eleven-time Olympic medalist. Biondi competed in three Olympic Games (1984, 1988, and 1992) and won a total of 11 medals, including eight gold, two silver, and one bronze medals. He was a world record-holder in five events and set three individual world records in the 50-meter freestyle and four in the 100-meter freestyle at the 1988 Olympic Games in Seoul.

Janet Evans (was born on August 28, 1971) Janet Evans is an American retired competitive swimmer who won three gold medals at the 1988 Olympics in Seoul. A former world record-holder, Evans went on to win another gold medal at the 1992 Olympics in Barcelona. The winner of the prestigious James E. Sullivan Award, Evans was adjudged Female World Swimmer of the Year in 1987, 1989, and 1990.

Jenny Thompson (was born on February 26, 1973) Known for winning more Olympic medals than any other female in the swimming category, Jenny Thompson had started swimming at age 7. She grew up to win swimming medals for Stanford University. She is also a qualified doctor and has practiced as an anesthesiologist and surgeon.

Natalie Coughlin (born Aug 23, 1982) is an American retired competitive swimmer. A 12-time Olympic medalist, Coughlin became the first American female athlete in the history of the modern Olympics to win six medals in one Olympics event at the 2008 Summer Olympics. She also became the first woman to win gold medals in two successive Olympics, she won the medals in the 100-meter backstroke event.

Ian Thorpe (was born on October 13, 1982) At the age of 14, Thorpe became the youngest male ever to represent Australia, and his victory in the 400 meter freestyle at the 1998 Perth World Championships made him the youngest-ever individual male World Champion. After that victory, Thorpe dominated the 400 m freestyle, winning the event at every Olympic, World, Commonwealth and Pan Pacific Swimming Championships until his break after the 2004 Olympics in Athens. At the 2001 World Aquatics Championships, he became the first person to win six gold medals in one World Championship. Aside from 13 individual long-course world records, Thorpe anchored the Australian relay teams, numbering the victories in the 4 × 100 m and the 4 × 200 m freestyle relays in Sydney among his five relay world records. His wins in the 200 m and 400 m and his bronze in the 100 m freestyle at the 2004 Summer Olympics made him the only male to have won medals in the 100–200–400combination.  He acquired the nickname “Thorpedo” because of his speed in swimming. Thorpe announced his retirement from competitive swimming in November 2006, citing waning motivation, he made a brief comeback in 2011 and 2012. In total, Thorpe has won eleven World Championship gold medals; this is the fifth-highest number of gold medals won by any male swimmer. Thorpe was the first person to have been named Swimming World Swimmer of the Year four times, and was the Australian Swimmer of the Year from 1999 to 2003. His athletic achievements made him one of Australia’s most popular athletes, and he was recognized as the Young Australian of the Year in 2000

Michael Fred Phelps II (born June 30, 1985) is an American former competitive swimmer. He is the most successful and most decorated Olympian of all time with a total of 28 medals. Phelps also holds the all-time records for Olympic gold medals (23), Olympic gold medals in individual events (13) Phelps is undoubtedly the world’s greatest swimmer of all time. Nicknamed “The Baltimore Bullet” Phelps is the most successful and most decorated Olympian of all time with a grand total of 28 medals. He holds the records for most Olympic gold medals won in individual events; most Olympic medals won in individual events; and most Olympic medals overall. He won six gold and two bronze medals at the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens, tying the record for eight medals in total at a single Olympic Games. When he won eight gold medals at the 2008 Beijing Games, he broke American swimmer Mark Spitz’s long-standing record of winning seven events in a single Olympic Games, which he achieved at the Munich Games in 1972.He won four gold and two silver medals at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London and five gold medals and one silver medal at the Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro in 2016 where he was also the flag bearer of the United States at the Parade of Nations. This win made him the most successful athlete in the Olympic Games for the fourth time in a row.

Dana Volmer (was born on November 13, 1987) Apart from winning 5 Olympic gold medals, swimmer Dana Vollmer also created history when she became the first female to swim under 56 seconds in the 100m butterfly event. Diagnosed with a heart condition at age 15, she went through surgery and later carried a defibrillator around with her.

Katina Hosszu (was born on May 3, in 1989) is a Hungarian swimmer, three-time Olympic champion, and nine-time long-course world champion. Nicknamed the “Iron Lady,” Hosszú specializes in individual medley events and is the current world record holder in the 100m individual medley, 200m individual medley (long course and short course), 400m individual medley (long course), and the 200m backstroke (short course).She has competed at four Olympic Games (2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016) and is the first swimmer in history to hold world records in all five individual medley events at the same time. She also holds two-thirds of the Hungarian national records and has been considered the most valuable Hungarian athlete for the past five years.

Miss Franklin (was born May 10, 1995) is an American former competition swimmer and five-time Olympic gold medalist. She formerly held the world record in the 200-meter backstroke (long course).[3][4] As a member of the U.S. national swim team, she also held the world records in the 4×100-meter medley relay (short course and long course).  In her Olympic debut at the 2012 Summer Olympics at age 17, Franklin won a total of five medals, four of which were gold. She swept the women’s backstroke events, winning gold in both the 100-meter and 200-meter backstroke. Franklin’s successes have earned her Swimming World‘s World Swimmer of the Year and the American Swimmer of the Year award in 2012 as well as the FINA Swimmer of the Year Award in 2011 and 2012. In total, she has won twenty-eight medals in international competition: seventeen gold, six silver, and five bronze, spanning the Olympics, the World Championships, the short course World Championships, and the Pan Pacific Championships. Franklin’s eleven gold medals at the World Aquatics Championships was a record in women’s swimming before Katie Ledecky broke it in 2017.

Kelly Ledecky (born March 17, 1997) Seven-time Olympic gold medalist Katie Ledecky has also won 15 world championship gold medals, creating a record. At 15, she was the youngest American Olympic swimming team member at the 2012 London Olympics. The 6-foot-tall athlete is also a Stanford graduate and was the youngest Time 100 member in 2016.

There were a few others that come to mine, but I thought these 20 were the best the past 120 years.

ARCHIE LEACH AND NORMA JEAN BAKER Who played their main character better? Oct. 16,2022

Marilyn Monroe remains a film and American con, not unlike others that died young, starting with Jeanne Eagles, a star of the 1920s, who died of drugs and alcoholism at age 39. Others, like Jean Harlow, the first blond bombshell, Judy Garland, and James Dean followed that same path to fan immortality. Aside from Monroe, there were many other great women stars, and the critics knew talent when they saw it: Greta Garbo, Bette Davis, Mary Astor, Greer Garson, Meryl Streep, Claudette Colbert, Vivian Leigh, Barbara Stanwyck, Katherine Hepburn, Jean Arthur, Susan Hayworth, Deborah Kerr, Audrey Hepburn and Ginger Rogers among many others. By the way, they were all attractive. If not, they could never have made it in the Golden Age of Hollywood.

As for blond bombshells there have been many that followed Jean Harlow, like, Virginia Mayo and Carol Landis. But no one could capture to her electricity. Others, like; Lana Turner, Betty Grable and ultimately Marilyn Monroe were the heirs to Harlow. Monroe certainly created a new look that brought on her own imitators, like Jayne Mansfield, Diana Dors, Joi Lansing, and Carol Wayne, who was an almost a regular on the Johnny Carson Show.

Cary Grant also had tremendous sex appeal to both genders and is possibly the most popular star of the Golden Age of Movies. He was part of a whole generation of British stars who came across the pond and made their fame and fortune in Hollywood. Among the many, the two most appreciated were Leslie Howard and Ronald Colman. Others like David Niven, James Mason and Noel Coward were very talented, but never big box office.

As for Marilyn, no one could deny her sex appeal and film charisma. But, In fact, I would judge Jean Harlow to be miles ahead of Monroe in talent. She also had her problems with her mother and her home life, like Mary Astor and many others. Throughout Hollywood history a number of husbands exploited their working wives, but in fact, neither Jim Daugherty, baseball super star, Joe DiMaggio nor famed playwright Arthur Miller exploited her. She dumped first husband Jim Daugherty, DiMaggio was a misogynist and had no clue regarding social graces, and Miller dumped his first wife for her. What else is new? Nothing can be deprecated regarding her strong sex-appeal. But this is nothing new in the world of Hollywood. In fact, the original “It Girl,” was Clara Bow. There were many, many others like, Lauren Bacall, Ava Gardner, Hedy LaMarr and Rita Hayworth, who many fans often call great actresses. They were far from it. Some have had more talent than others, but they would hardly be compared with other stars of the Golden Age of Hollywood: Greta Garbo, Bette Davis, Greer Garson, Joan Crawford, Ida Lupino, Claudette Colbert, Rosalind Russell, Vivien Leigh, Irene Dunne, and Barbara Stanwyck

For sure, not every evaluation is based on sex or sexism. Not every man is a male chauvinist, and there have been countless women who have taken advantage of their good looks to climb up the ladder of fame, success and fortune. I believe, and know, that Monroe had enough talent to come off the pages of the fan magazine, pass a screen text, and be shaped by the body and face sculptors of Hollywood. After that re-make effort, one must really judge her body of work, not just her body! Frankly, I have always liked her in pretty much whatever she did. But, whom am I, but another red-blooded American boy!

Obviously there are film buffs, critics, casual fans and others who buy into “the cult of the personality.” In reading various comments on Marilyn Monroe, one finds two overwhelming dynamics: one an over-analysis of all of her films as some critics and fans try to find the secret to her electricity, allure, and as Billy Wilder said, “flesh appeal” and the other, a more detailed look at what she really accomplished, the depth of her roles, her actual skills and how they evolved. She, unlike Cary Grant (Archie Leach), was most often the character the studio poobahs cast he as in film after film. Hollywood loves to milk success to the last drop.

Obviously, the great actor can play almost any role and that doesn’t include playing themselves. From my perspective, both Jean Baker/Monroe and leach/Grant developed certain personas that the studios and the fans could easily buy into! They certainly both remained decent box office almost to the end.

Of course, in the male-dominated world of Hollywood, where “meatier” roles for women were often as rare as hen’s teeth. It was where powerful males, before WWII, who dominated: Clark Gable, Gary Cooper, Spencer Tracy, Tyrone Power, James Cagney, etc. Later on more sensitive roles developed for a new generation of male stars, like Henry Fonda, Gregory Peck, Jimmy Stewart and even Humphrey Bogart. Archie Leach/Cary Grant, especially before the war, was able to maintain his strong masculine appeal while basically playing light comedy, for which he was well-suited and quite unique.

As with Cary Grant, I liked him for decades. I thought he was sort of funny, irreverent and charming, in sort of an insincere way. He certainly was entertaining in Gunga Din, Our Gal Friday and Arsenic and Old Lace. But, in his more realistic roles with Notorious and Suspicion, two Hitchcock films, I found him playing himself, but this time, of course, in a more serious vein. His jealousy over Bergman/Huberman’s marriage to former N*zi Claude Rains/Huberman in Argentina was hard to swallow. Was he good in it? Others could have played it better. We are led into a tangled web of love, marriage, alienation, spying and international politics. In this treatment, the heroine, Ingrid Bergman/Alicia Huberman is basically forced to marry and spy on a man she does not love. Her safety and well-being becomes almost immediately compromised and her real lover, Cary Grant/TR Devlin must decide where his loyalties lie, with her, or her mission. Of course, he didn’t write the script, but was he realistic? I didn’t think so!

Other films that should be mentioned!

Sylvia Scarlett

Topper

The Awful Truth

Holiday

The Philadelphia Story

The Talk of the Town

As for Suspicion, the film was so distorted at the end, that it was unbelievable. Does he kill his wife or not? That wasn’t his fault. The film was all about Hitchcockian suspense, but its ending was as pathetic as North by Northwest. Why does Hitchcock create this duplicitous, almost transparent bounder, and in the last scene turn him back to some misunderstood lover? My guess is that the studio didn’t want to see Cary Grant as a wife killer!  Maybe he should have cast Joseph Cotton or Dan Duryea for the part, but they weren’t “boffo” or big box-office.

.In fact, was there anything realistic about North by Northwest? If there was, it escapes me. In the crop duster spraying Roger (Grant) his hair was hardly mussed, then the crop duster crashes into an oil truck! Huh! He pulls a knife from the back of someone stabbed at the UN, the house where he is nearly drowned by liquor suddenly being cleaned out in 5 minutes, and then the idiotic ending at Mount Rushmore. Hitchcock threw everything into that finish, reminiscent of Saboteurs ending at the Statue of Liberty. The whole film was so ridiculous and could it been better without Grant, who knows? Again is it Cary Grant playing Cary Grant or is it Archie Leach, the cockney from Bristol, England?

Of course, getting back to North by Northwest, which seems, by all the ratings and many critics, to be a very popular and entertaining film, is typical Hitchcockian!  Cary Grant aka Roger Thornhill, becomes the typical Hitchcock foil or fool, the man who gets sucked into the vortex of miss-identification  not unlike, the main characters in Saboteur, Strangers on a Train, or The Wrong Man.

Aside from his obvious sex appeal to both men and women, Leach/Grant’s sexuality was always rumored about, especially from the time he shared a beach house with Randolph Scott in Malibu, through his five marriages. Of course, there have been rumors about every Hollywood personage since day one. One notorious incident was seen on television back in 1980.

On Tom Snyder’s talk show Tomorrow, Chevy Chase was asked, “People say you’re going to be the next Cary Grant,” and I said, “That’s crazy, there’s nobody like Cary Grant and there will never be another Cary Grant and I understand he was a homo,” In that 1980 appearance, Chase had followed up with, “He was brilliant. What a gal!” in reference to Grant.

The day after Chase’s NBC talk show appearance, Grant filed a $10 million defamation lawsuit against the comedian for his comments. The case was reportedly settled in court and, though neither actor commented on the settlement, it is reported Chase paid $1 million in damages. A lesson to the wise, watch what you say in public.

But, he wasn’t the first one to speculate on Grant, or Monroe, or many others. Whatever they were, their performances are still around for all of us to see. As time has moved on, it seems their fans seem to continue to grow and no one really remembers the rumors, their backgrounds or what really motivated them.

The following were mostly Grant’s WWII era and Post war films:

 Once Upon a Honeymoon

Mr. Lucky (all right)

Night and Day (Grant as Cole Porter- incredibly miscast and the film a total fabrication)

The Bachelor and the Bobby Soxer

Every Girl Should be Married

Destination Tokyo (typical war film, American captain with a British accent)

I was a War Bride

Crisis

People Will Talk 

Room for One More

Monkey Business

To Catch a Thief (silly)

An Affair to Remember

Pride and the Passion (horrible)

Kiss Them for Me

Indiscreet

House Boat

North by Northwest

Operation Petticoat

That Touch of Mink                              

Charade

Father Goose

Walk Don’t Run

 What can one say for that body of work? Aside from None but the Lonely Heart., few had real critical acclaim or are memorable. These films aren’t completely his fault. He was paid to be an actor, given roles and fulfilled them. But, generally speaking, I couldn’t sit through any of them today, and most are forgettable. Again is Leach playing Cary Grant in another venue. As for To Catch a Thief and Charade, they are again almost frivolous, light comedy, basically ridiculous, and unbelievable, I assume they were quite entertaining at the time. Whenever I see them, I laugh!

Of course, here is a list of ALL of Monroe’s films. The last, Something’s Got to Give was never made. Of all the 31 others, she did not become a headliner until #22 Gentleman Prefer Blondes. As for the rest, maybe 5 or 6 were worthy of critical comment! By the way, they were both in Monkey Business.

  1. Dangerous Years(1947)
  2. The Shocking Miss Pilgrim(1947)
  3. Scudda Hoo! Scudda Hay!(1948)
  4. Green Grass of Wyoming(1948)
  5. Ladies of the Chorus(1948)
  6. Love Happy(1949)
  7. A Ticket to Tomahawk(1950)
  8. The Asphalt Jungle(1950)
  9. Right Cross(1950)
  10. The Fireball(1950)
  11. All About Eve(1950)
  12. Home Town Story(1951)
  13. As Young as You Feel(1951)
  14. Love Nest(1951)
  15. Let’s Make It Legal(1951)
  16. Clash by Night(1952)
  17. We’re Not Married!(1952)
  18. Don’t Bother to Knock(1952)
  19. O. Henry’s Full House(1952)
  20. Monkey Business(1952)
  21. Niagara(1953)
  22. Gentlemen Prefer Blondes(1953)
  23. How to Marry a Millionaire(1953)
  24. River of No Return(1954)
  25. There’s No Business Like Show Business(1954)
  26. The Seven Year Itch(1955)
  27. Bus Stop(1956)
  28. The Prince and the Showgirl(1957)
  29. Some Like It Hot(1959)
  30. Let’s Make Love(1960)
  31. The Misfits(1961)
  32. Something’s Got to Give(1962)

 For sure, not every evaluation is based on sex or sexism. Not every man is a male chauvinist, and there have been countless women who have taken advantage of their good looks to climb up the ladder of fame, success and fortune. I believe, and know, that Monroe had enough talent to come off the pages of the fan magazine, pass a screen text, and be shaped by the body and face sculptors of Hollywood. After that re-make effort, one must really judge her body of work, not just her body! Frankly, I have always liked her in pretty much whatever she did. But, whom am I, but another red-blooded American boy!

Obviously there are film buffs, critics, casual fans and others who buy into “the cult of the personality.” In reading various comments on Marilyn Monroe, one finds two overwhelming dynamics: one an over-analysis of all of her films as some critics and fans try to find the secret to her electricity, allure, and as Billy Wilder said, “flesh appeal” and the other, a more detailed look at what she really accomplished, the depth of her roles, her actual skills and how they evolved. She, unlike Cary Grant (Archie Leach), was most often the character the studio poobahs cast he as in film after film. Hollywood loves to milk success to the last drop.

 

Some other views of the film Giant! April-22 2022

I always thought Giant was a big, pretentious, overly-long bore. I watched it not so long ago. Aside that people seem to like those long epics in the 1950s, as shallow as they were, many still do! What always amazed me was the scene in the diner, where the owner, a bigot (Sarge), refused to serve some customers who weren’t white (Mexicans)! What else was new in Texas in those days? Rock (I am always amazed at that name) Hudson (Bick) gets in a brawl with this huge guy! They must hit each other enough to either break their hands (I have been in a few fist fights and did some boxing) or kill each other with hits to the head. The next scene has the lovers at home with Rock/Bick’s head in Liz’s lap. There isn’t a bruise on his face. Wow another miracle of modern medicine.

Personally, I never bought into the brilliance of Dean, who had too short of a career to really judge, and Hudson was never much of an actor. He may have been worse than Robert Taylor, but not as pretty. As for Elizabeth Taylor, very attractive, short and I always thought her life was summed up in the film Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf? It seems Burton was perfect for her, a drunk, who pissed away his life. Liz, with all her frailties survived Burton to find more men.

Speaking of other opinions, less complimentary was director and critic Francois Truffaut, who in an early review called Giant a  “silly, solemn, sly, paternalistic, demagogic movie without any boldness, rich in all sorts of concessions, pettiness, and contemptible actions.”

A stinker. Seriously. The Hollywood studio icons (Taylor, Hudson) don’t mesh well here with the new methodistas (Dean, Hopper)—and there is film evidence that they can work well together (see anything with Taylor and Clift). The script is a mess; there is no plot to speak of; the bigotry is rampant and unrepentant. Texas looks kind of pretty, but mostly this is an overlong mess. Stevens directed better films. The only real interest here is watching James Dean steal scene after scene with the studio stars he shared screen time with, through slouching, mumbling and general assholery.

Surprisingly avoids any real lulls for a 3 1/2 hour film but lacks cohesion and thematic resonance because of its sloppy and unfocused script. An overarching motif to tie all the threads together would have helped give the film power and emphasis. Instead, I am left wondering what exactly I witnessed.

Given that the film leaves on a note of defying prejudices, one would think this was a social commentary film a la Gentleman’s Agreement or To Kill a Mockingbird, however, it is shoehorned and unwarranted. Rather than sprinkling in such distracting notions, the film perhaps would have been better off focusing on and developing more, the interesting aspects it superficially delved into.

There are other facets to the film as well, such as those involving supporting characters, but they are also lacking in execution. For instance we see an interesting set up with James Dean’s character Jett, who is exemplified as a frustrated failure, exhibiting a sort of pathetic jealousy of the success of his employer Mr. Benedict, yet the payoff is less than satisfactory. Rather than a subplot showcasing the Texas-way of grit and determination in one-upmanship, Jett, after schlubbing away on his newly acquired land, ends up having “success find him” when he inadvertently strikes riches in lottery-like fashion. This, in addition to the Benedicts inheriting their wealth, shows us success as being more a matter of privilege than perseverance, struggle, and hard work. There is nothing on par here with say the O’Hara’s of Gone With the Wind overcoming the pillaging of their beloved Tara or the tragic gas blowout and insanity inducing oil fire experienced by Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood. Here, success comes rather easy, despite earlier scenes of a blue-collar work ethic giving us a brief glimpse at the contrary.

We are also given other notions which are hinted at: corruption of power or dehumanization from vain materialism and corporatism? This is perhaps shown by Jett’s embarrassing meltdown of misery and preceding fisticuffs with the eldest Benedict son. The scene certainly seemed unmerited and lacked genuine escalation to that point however.

Big soap. Biiiiiiig soap. It’s the kind of movie you’ll be glad you watched once and will nevertheless cringe at the prospect of watching ever again. Interesting that this movie was released the same year as The Searchers, since both films clearly want to empathize with and simultaneously dwarf the struggles of Texas families among the staggering landscapes surrounding them. The film is incredibly handsome, not even so much for the landscapes but for the interiors that are emphasized against the grand landscapes. In retrospect, this must’ve been a pretty easy movie to shoot considering the money that was probably thrown at it: just build a huge opulent mansion in the middle of nowhere and shoot with wide lenses. It’s hard to screw that natural beauty up. And yet it’s also interesting how the characters seem dwarfed inside the house(s), too: they’re swallowed or smothered in shadow (contrasted by the fact that everything’s bright outside, even fire or the kicked-up dust or the dining on what looks like tuliped liver). For a while the movie seems like it’s not even particularly interested in people at all, not that there’s anything wrong with that. (The courtship setup in the first 20 minutes is handles so quickly, eager to get the preliminaries out of the way, that it’s hard to catch your bearings for a while.)

Giant is basically two movies. There’s the interesting movie that involves the upstart oil baron played by Dean and the overwrought melodrama involving Elizabeth Taylor and Rock Hudson. When Dean is on screen, the film cooks. When we’re left with just Taylor and Hudson, the picture is stuffy and long in the tooth. George Stevens gives us a lot of interesting things to look at, particularly the massive house belonging to Taylor and Hudson. It sits alone on the land, a monument to an ideal that Hudson’s character believes in, an ideal that drives a wedge between him and his wife. It serves a similar role as Kane’s Xanadu in Citizen Kane. Unfortunately, the interesting visual aspects aren’t enough to meld the two disparate story lines into a cohesive whole.

Personally speaking, I could take the original, 1931 film Cimarron with Richard Dix and Irene Dunne any day of the week over Giant!. It’s about the west, almost the same time period, about oil, but with a much more interesting story of the State of Oklahoma, hypocrisy, money and justice.

More:

Like the title says, it’s a whopper: 201 minutes of a Texas family’s rise to fame and fortune, based on an Edna Ferber novel. Much of it is awful, but it’s almost impossible not to be taken in by the narrative sprawl: like many big, bad movies, Giant is an enveloping experience, with a crazy life and logic of its own. George Stevens directed, at the height of his bloated epic period (1956), but unlike his A Place in the Sun, this one isn’t entirely sober and sanctimonious; it takes some pleasure in melodrama for its own sake. The mansion on the plain, designed by art director Boris Levin, remains one of the most memorable graphic images of the 50s. With Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, and James Dean—in his last and strangest role. David Kehr, The Reader

But at least a very top-notch critic like Richard Schickel liked it!

I found myself — all twitchy intellectualism aside — liking it enormously. There’s more to Stevens’s exteriors than those great shots of the looming ranch house. He had learned John Ford’s trick of keeping the horizon low in the frame, and there are literally dozens of long, wide shots that are more than merely awesome. They suggest an emptiness that stumbling, ill-educated, materialistic people will somehow fill with something — oil derricks, bragging Texas talk, reactionary politics. [Reprinted in the NY Times

 

 

Speaking of Suspicion: Another strange ending to a very well-constructed film! March 24, 2023

RKO didn’t have the courage of its convictions. Having bought the rights to Francis Iles’ novel, and despite Hitchcock’s insistence on sticking with the original ending, neither preview audiences nor the studio were ready to accept Cary Grant as a murderer. So its present ending was hastily written and shot. It completely subverts all the fine work that’s gone before. Johnny is seen throughout the film as the bounder he is. No one watching him could believe anything else.

Joan Fontaine was a brilliant actress and valiantly, passionately, breathlessly tries to make the shockingly amateurish dialogue in the final scene work — “Oh, Johnny! You were going to kill yourself instead of me, like the audience and I have thought for the last 90 minutes! Oh, Johnny! It’s as much my fault as it is yours! Oh, Johnny! I was only thinking of myself . . . ,” etc.

Cary Grant does his best with this final abomination of a climax. “Lina! Lina! How much can one man bear! When you and the audience thought I was in Paris murdering Beaky I was really in Liverpool!” Etc. Huh!

In other words, this beautifully produced, directed, acted and written psychological suspense thriller turns out to be about a charming lazy n’er-do-well who’s sponged and embezzled his way through life, who marries a beautiful but neurotic aristocrat who, from day one, increasingly assumes the worst about her husband — convincing herself (and us) that he’s killed before and now is about to kill her?

“Just kidding,” the tacked-on final scene says. “It was all innocent. You eating popcorn out there in the dark, and Lina, should be ashamed for even THINKING such things! Go home now.”

It helps, out of self-defense, to watch “Suspicion” with the original ending in mind. Yes, the milk is poisoned. Yes Johnny killed Beaky in Paris. Yes, he’s a psychopath who lies, cheats, steals and kills. Yes, Lina believed him and loved him deeply — the only man she’s ever loved. Yes, her life is no longer worth living, now that she knows the truth about Johnny. Yes, she rightly suspects that milk is poisoned. So she writes a letter to her mother, telling the truth about Johnny’s exploits, and that he is poisoning her as she writes — and that she intends to die. She seals the letter and gives it to Johnny to mail. She drinks the milk. Johnny leaves and unknowingly drops Lina’s letter into a mailbox, thus sealing his fate.

THAT’S a rewarding ending.

It also makes everything that’s gone before (including writing, directing, performances and cinematography) plausible. It gives “Suspicion” a reason to exist.

But that’s the novel’s ending.

Goldfinger-Sneak Preview 1964 = May 24, 2023

Goldfinger, thought of by the critics as the “Gold Standard” of Bond Films opened at the DeMille Theater in NYC, in December of 1964, and soon after all over America. But there was a sneak preview in Boston at their massive Music Hall Theater on Washington Street.

Goldfinger was heralded as the film in the franchise where James Bond “comes into focus”. Its release led to a number of promotional licensed tie-in items, including a toy Aston Martin from Corgi Toys which became the biggest selling toy of 1964. The promotion also included an image of gold-painted Eaton on the cover of Life.

Many of the elements introduced in the film appeared in many of the later James Bond films, such as the extensive use of technology and gadgets by Bond, an extensive pre-credits sequence that stood largely alone from the main storyline, multiple foreign locales and tongue in cheek humor and double entendre humor. Goldfinger was the first Bond film to win an Oscar (for best Sound Editing) and opened to largely favorable critical reception. The film was a financial success, recouping its budget in two weeks and grossing over $120 million worldwide.

In Boston, it was advertised as a sneak preview of a British spy movie. It was to be shown in the afternoon at the Music Hall. The theater which was originally opened in the 19th Century was converted for use as a vaudeville theater in 1900 and operated under a number of different names, including the Music Hall and the Empire Theatre. In 1906, it was renamed the Orpheum Theater. In 1915, the theater was acquired by the Loew’s chain and reopened again in 1916, rebuilt with a completely new interior. At the time of the viewing it was estimated that it held 5000 seats and had many, many balconies.

Well students all over Boston read the ads in the Boston Globe and Herald Examiner and the word spread like wild fire. The theater was jammed. The cost was $5.00, or the value of $50-60 today! When I got there with a sate (that was crazy) we got in the last two seats in the top balcony, only 3-4 rows from the back. We had to climb over everyone. Well it was a spectacular opening, as all of us know, But the real clamor and noise came when James Bond/Sean Connery met the pilot of Goldfinger’s fleet of planes, Miss Galore/Honor Blackman. When she introduced herself as P*ssy Galore, the throng went insane.

Her name on the advertising poster and flyers was “Miss” Galore. It was a remarkable event!

On 1-21-21, we the new Bond film- “No Time to Die.” As a long-time Bond fan, who drove my sister to see the first Bond film in Stamford in 1963, It was great! I was hooked from then on like zillions of others. As for the newest Bond flick, I was quite disappointed. Of course, it was a long wait and the reports were never fabulous about the film. Personally, I found it too long, convoluted, confusing and at times quite ridiculous. All Bond films suspend reality to one degree or another. But, this one seemed to re-invent disbelief.  Daniel Craig seemed almost bored with the effort. No Bond music, no quips, no real interaction, just a man who seemed resigned to his fate. What happened to the bold, sardonic, suave, sophisticated world player?

With that in mind I decided to check out all the different opinions on which Bond films were the best to the worst. I was not surprised at the cumulative findings of the top three. But, I was surprised how many reviewers liked, “On His Majesty’s Service” with one-time Bond, George Lazenby. Generally speaking both “Dr. No” and “Thunderball” were rated highly, but there were a few who skewed both films. Those outlier reviews pushed those films out of the top five.

Also, remember some of the polls never rated “Never Say Never Again,” and other polls were published before the release of latest Bond film. “Live and Let Die” also reflected some wildly diverse opinion, from a #1, 5 and 9 among many generally poor reviews. I was also very surprised by the strong showing of “Goldeneye!”  Personally, I loved “Casino Royale,” and was mostly disappointed by the other Craig efforts. I liked him, but I found “Spectre” and Quantum of Solace” wanting. “Skyfall” was hard to swallow, but many seemed to like it. Personally, I thought that Timothy Dalton was underrated as Bond, but for sure the best was Sean Connery, with Craig exceptional in “Casino Royale!” By the way, few liked “View to a Kill,” but I thought it was a very interesting premise and entertaining. Almost all the Bond films were entertaining and that is why they all have done so well. It will be a challenge to fill Craig’s shoes!  Richard